Your Clinical Trunk (M2) year is arguably the most challenging, exciting, and rewarding part of your medical school training. So much will happen during this year. You will see new life, death, healing, heartbreaking sadness, medical miracles, and much more.
As the year progresses, you will also begin to consider the next direction you take within the fields of medicine that you wish to pursue. At some point, most everyone will ask some form of the question: I want to enter X specialty — what does it take (or do I have what it takes) to get into that field?
The following information is aimed at providing a least an initial foray into the answer to that question.
To start this conversation, the competitiveness of the major medical specialty fields are categorized into three tiers:
- Moderately competitive
- Less competitive
Competitive programs that are the most difficult to match into include:
- Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery
- General Surgery
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Plastic Surgery
- Radiation Oncology
Moderately competitive programs include:
- Emergency Medicine
- Medicine/Pediatrics (combined)
- Radiology (Diagnostic)
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Less competitive specialties include:
- Family Medicine
- Internal Medicine
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
These categories are meant to provide a general guideline, but know that there is fluidity, and nuance to these categories, and that the boundaries between them are not fixed. Regardless of the category of competitiveness, any one program can be considered more competitive depending on other variables such as program location, prestige, etc.
For example, despite the fact that Internal Medicine is categorized as a “less competitive” specialty, the most highly respected and renowned Internal Medicine residency programs are highly competitive and therefore difficult to get into. Exceptions in the opposite direction generally do not hold up as well. That is, the least prestigious Dermatology program in the least desirable location is still likely a highly competitive program, as there are consistently many more applicants in Dermatology than there are available slots across the country.
In order to be a strong candidate for competitive specialties, one must have at least a “very good” academic profile.
What is a very good academic profile?
As a general rule, there are 3 criteria that are very critical to your residency application: Step 1, Step 2, and Clinical Trunk grades.
We will classify these criteria as “Class A” parts of your residency application.
Although an oversimplification, it can be helpful to think about match prospects in the following manner: A student can “underperform” on one of the Class A parts, and recover by doing very well on the other two parts.
Low performance on 2 parts however, quite likely limits match possibilities. And low performance on all 3 Class A criteria almost certainly narrows one’s match possibilities.
A discussion of Step 1 will be approached first by breaking down scores into 4 separate categories.
The scores used to create the boundaries of each category are somewhat arbitrary, but they provide a starting place for explanation.
- Passing-215: Scores in this range are considered low. It is very important to remember that students who score in this range still have 2 other critical Class A criteria where they can show improvement. Both UMMS and national AAMC Match data suggests however that sub 200 Step 1 scores will likely start to limit a student’s match possibilities to the lesser competitive specialties.
- 215-230: This range is considered “OK to good.” Still, at the lower end of this range, some limitations in the match process may occur. A score in this range (especially at the upper end of the range), however, paired with solid performances on the other 2 pieces can keep some doors open in the more competitive categories.
- 230-245: This range is considered good. Students with scores in this range will likely have most to all doors open to all specialties, especially if paired with at least good performances on Step 2 and clinical grades.
- 245-255: Scores in this range are considered very good. These scores are viewed very positively by program directors. Scores in this range typically indicate that all specialties can remain in contention for matching. However, a strong Step 1 score alone is not in and of itself enough to ensure a match into a competitive specialty. Students must have other strong data to support a very strong Step 1 score.
- 250 and above: Scores in this range are considered excellent. These scores are viewed very positive by program directors and can serve to significantly bolster the match possibilities for applicants and allow for all specialties to remain in contention for matching. Additionally, scores in this range can be a significant factor in matching at the most prestigious training programs in the country. "Cutoff scores” refers to an interview screening strategy that is employed at some competitive programs, especially in the more competitive specialties. These programs allegedly will offer interviews only to applicants with scores at the above their predetermined cutoff level. Some programs will publish their cutoff scores on their website, while others do not. There are many rumors about Step I cutoffs, but little reliable data. If concerned about cutoffs, it is best to check a program's website. Unfortunately, at this time we do not know of any trustworthy clearinghouse of information regarding cutoff scores.
By far, the vast majority of the class finishes the M2 year with a mixture of clinical grades.
Program directors highly value clinical performance, as this criterion reflects much more than a score on a test. Your teamwork, dedication, knowledge base, bedside manner, communication, handling of difficult patients, clinical skills, work ethic, etc., are all part of what is attempted to be captured by your clinical evaluations.
Final clinical grades are always determined most significantly by a combination of clinical evaluations and shelf scores. As is published in your Clinical Trunk handbook, the M2 year is graded on an Honors (top 25-30%), High Pass (30-40%), and Pass (30-40%) system. The target percentages can vary slightly between clerkships, but not significantly so.
It is a statement of the obvious, but the more Honors and High Passes earned in the Clinical Trunk, the better the clinical record. Conversely, the more M2 Passes earned, the lower the record. Despite that, a Pass grade represents an adequate performance. Passes across the entire M2 year constitutes a low clinical performance. A low clinical performance paired with a low Step 1 score almost certainly limits a student to consider only the less competitive specialties.
There are several more important points to consider.
Honors grades are difficult to earn, but be aware that an all High Pass record across the M2 year is a very good performance. Of course, any Honors grades are always helpful, but there is often a misperception that “many” Honors grades are needed to match well in competitive specialties, and sub-specialties. For the most desirable programs (Metropolitan cities in coastal areas: San Francisco, Boston, Seattle, etc.) in the more competitive specialties, at least some Honors grades are likely needed to make one’s application viable.
The categories of scores listed above for Step 1 and the impact on matching applies to Step 2 CK as well. Do know however, that the mean scores for Step 2 are generally approximately 10-15 points higher for Step 2 CK, so all the categories and score boundaries (discussed above regarding Step 1) should be increased by 10 points.
Remember, for any student who experiences a bad test day, a bad test, an interrupted study period, etc., for Step 1 — know that a good performance on the Step 2 CK exam can go a long way in countering the effects of a disappointing Step 1 score.
Also, many program directors are well aware that Step 2 CK is a much better indicator of the type of intern you will be as compared to Step 1. Therefore, a good, solid, (and early reported) Step 2 CK score can serve as an effective way to improve a student’s application.
Class B Criteria: Interviews
Of the non-Class A criteria, the interview is arguably the criteria that can carry the most potential for being a “game changer.”
Think of your residency application process in two steps. The first step is a “paper” you: your CV, scores, grades, etc. The "paper you" gives a lot of information, but the "paper you" is not all of you. That is why programs want to see you, ask questions, listen, look into your eyes, shake your hand — and get a sense of you that can’t be obtained from words on paper.
For these reasons, the interview is a potentially powerful part of the process that can sometimes help a student get into a program that their academic record alone would not predict. But for everyone, a good interview where you display courtesy, kindness, interest, respect, humane qualities, asking insightful questions, etc., can always help your chances with any program.
Class C Criteria
Class C criteria include research, extracurricular activities, leadership roles, grades in the Branches, personal statement, publications, letters of recommendation, Dean’s letter (MSPE), etc.
In general, the Class C criteria can all be seen as the “supporting cast” of criteria. These variables tend to be used for making finer distinctions — when all else between potential candidates seems equal in comparison.
These criteria rarely help a student match into a specialty if one’s academic record (Class A variables) are less competitive. Nevertheless, these class C variables should not be ignored, and in some cases, some Class C variables can sometimes rise to a Class B criteria in importance.
For instance, research-oriented fields (e.g. Radiology, Plastic Surgery, Radiation Oncology, etc.) will often more highly value research experience and scholarly work. Similarly, residencies that are academically oriented will understandably value more highly research and publications.
Of particular relevance is the AAMC/NRMP document Charting Outcomes in the Match, (search on http://www.nrmp.org/main-residency-match-data/) which provides the most current data on the match process broken down by specialty. It is essential to be well-informed, and these resources contain a plethora of excellent information that is invaluable.
Similar matching data that is derived from our own University of Michigan graduates is in the document: “5 Year Composite of Match Results”. The specific hospital/program name with the corresponding Clinical Trunk grades, Step 1, and Step 2 CK scores are provided with student’s names de-identified.
This document is an attempt to provide some very fundamental information and perspective on the criteria that have bearing on the match process. Know however, that there is a good bit of nuance to matching, and so therefore it is critical to get individualized feedback on your career decisions and residency application process from OMSE Deans, Department/ Faculty advisors, Branch advisors/directors, Doctoring faculty, and House Counselors. We are all here….to support you!